In a separate paper[], we have shown that in an
amorphous material, where the surface energy is completely isotropic
in direction, a crack under mixed modes will deviate out of the
initial crack path into the path where on the branching
crack. In such cases, crack deviation is, of course, easy, and widely
observed. But in a lattice,
where
has cusps on the high density planes, only certain
special planes are allowed for cleavage. In this paper, we have shown
that significant Mode II can be sustained by a crack, up to the limits
governed by the stability diagram. Indeed, for any given lattice,
branching may be quite difficult, because not only must the Griffith
relation on the branching plane be satisfied (with any additional
cornering resistance which may be necessary),
but dislocation emission on one of the allowed planes might intervene
before the relevant Griffith relation is satisfied.
We performed a simulation to explore the case of branching in a
completely homogeneous lattice where all interfacial and chemical
effects were taken out. For
the UBER force law, we found that branching was possible only for a
range parameter corresponding to the largest possible unstable
stacking fault, for the reason quoted above-sufficiently large
(negative) values were
necessary, such that dislocation emission tended to occur on the
cleavage plane. When branching was finally
induced, however, it became possible only for a very narrow,
essentially unique, load range, for which it was found that
was not zero, but rather
when branching occurred.
We consider this finding to be a significant violation of the
expectation of He and Hutchinson[] that
at branching.
Presumably the reason for the violation is that the stability diagram
on the branching plane covers a range of
values, and in the
UBER law, only the extreme lower limit of the branching stability
curve is reachable, and then only for a specific value of the range
parameter.
Thus, in the lattice, in spite of the continuum
prediction that is maximized when
, the
stability line on the branching plane encompasses a range of
values. Therefore, a complete analysis of the stability diagram
for the given
force law, including competing dislocation emission on all possible
planes is necessary, in order to predict when
branching will occur.
Hutchinson Mear and Rice[] also apply the criterion
for predicting the plane on which cracking will occur when the crack
runs parallel to an interface. Presumably similar difficulties will
arise in that case when the material is a crystal and not amorphous.
Any plane parallel to the interface where the crack satisfies the
stability criterion will be a possible plane of cracking. Since
can reach values in the approximate range of 0.25 to 0.5
for reasonable force laws for stable cracks, and a crack, once
established on a stable plane will not deviate from it, there should
be a range of possible planes where a crack will be stable on a plane
parallel to an interface.